Mysterious, symbolic [pierwszy akapit nadmienić ptak kolory postaci oczy and so on], interpretively neverending haha neverending story, colorfully intriguing, provocative – this characteristics make the painting Nevermore painted by Paul Gauguin in 1897 on Tahiti so interesting as a subject for analysis, both visual and critical [ib]. The analysis, as well as comparison of two art historians’ approaches to the painting, are the aim of this essay. In my investigation I am going to discuss the way [who] and [who] see ‘Nevermore’ as well as evaluate strengths and weaknesses of their arguments. Furthermore, I am going to present my point of view based on in depth research of sources including [blab la bla]. I hope to show that neither [who] nor [who] is completely right in their assumptions [totalnie sprzeczne opinie i żadna nie dotyka problemu!!], as what they emphasize is not the most important aspect of the painting. What I am going to prove crucial is the need to apply a ‘later’ Freudian interpretation, creating a dream-like word of suggestion rather than [what? Reading!], which is what Gauguin presumably intended[what? FREUDian interpretation!]
Jest po drugiej. Trudno. Ostatni tydzień, byle przetrwać, chcę już Lech Walesa Airport i żadnych esejów. Powyższe to przykład jak wygląda zazwyczaj my introduction - prawdę mówiąc, już wyszlifowałam, ale wersja 1.0 właśnie taka. Ułańska fantazja.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz